The world is talking about ChatGPT, the new chatbot that can give frightening answers. While ChatGPT left hundreds of thousands of people open with what it did, İrem Yeniceler Kortak, an academic from Istanbul Arel University, who has studies on artificial intelligence and big data, made special statements to Mynet. Kortak, evaluating the present and future of ChatGPT, which is quite surprising even with what it is doing now, said, “It can put people’s jobs at risk and bring them to the point of losing their jobs.”
Enes Çırtlık / Mynet – Chatbot ChatGPT has become the most talked about technology of recent days. ChatGPT, the next generation chatbot of OpenAI, of which Elon Musk is one of the founders, became famous for surprising those who saw it. ChatGPT, which does not have much knowledge for the post 2021 period, but can still surprisingly answer questions from every subject, can also speak Turkish. The chatbot can create stories, do translations and even code. In short, it can perform many tasks that are considered ‘can’t’. Some even get ChatGPT to do their homework.
“THIS IS A GREAT ADVANTAGE”
İrem Yeniceler Kortak, “What are the advantages and disadvantages, pros and cons of ChatGPT?” He answered the question as follows:
“It looks like it will also deepen the knowledge gap”
Cortak, How is ChatGPT viewed in the academic field, what are your impressions from the people around you? to the question;
However, there is still a very large audience in the world who do not have internet access. These developments in the face of this audience seem to deepen the existing knowledge gap. Maybe even this could be a research topic. However, if I have to answer the question in general, I think that such homework or short-term information will make a negative contribution to the knowledge level of people in the long run. he replied.
Cortak, “There are said to be people who even make ChatGPT do their homework. Does this improve or worsen global education systems?” If the question is “I think it makes it worse. Doing research is very important for learning information. Without the research part, it is very difficult to keep the information learned in mind.
First of all, there is no control system for the information disseminated in this technology. In terms of journalism, it has become difficult to prevent fake news, the number of which has increased with the new media, while such technologies can make it even more difficult to question the accuracy of information. In addition, since this technology is still in the experimental stage, it is very difficult to predict the effect it will have. There is already a warning in the system that the system may produce erroneous information.”
“ChatGPT is actually based on the use of artificial intelligence’s natural language processing method. I think artificial intelligence technologies greatly facilitate people’s daily lives. At this point, ChatGPT can enable people to perform operations that take long hours in their daily lives in a short time. However, every technology has advantages as well as risks.
İrem Yeniceler Kortak, “What are the advantages and disadvantages, pros and cons of ChatGPT?” He answered the question as follows:
İrem Yeniceler Kortak, an academic from Istanbul Arel University, who has studies on artificial intelligence and big data, made important statements about ChatGPT, which some see as dangerous enough to destroy humanity, and some say that it will close the era of search engines and start a new era like the internet.
“IT IS EXTREMELY HARD TO ESTIMATE THE IMPACT”
“I THINK IT SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS ACADEMIC WORK”
First of all, there is no control system for the information disseminated in this technology. In terms of journalism, it has become difficult to prevent fake news, the number of which has increased with the new media, while such technologies can make it even more difficult to question the accuracy of information. In addition, since this technology is still in the experimental stage, it is very difficult to predict the effect it will have. There is already a warning in the system that the system may produce erroneous information.”
